CRL OP No. 17661 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 17661 of 2026 1. Nagaraj S/o Duraisamipillai, No.2/79B, Mettu street, S.Agrahram Post and Village, Tiruvallur District. 2. Manivannan S/o Nagaraj, No.2/79A, Kizh street, S.Agraharam Post and Village, Tiruvallur District. 3. Vijay S/o Nagaraj, No.2/79 B, Mettu street, S.Agraharam Post and Village, Tiruvallur District. 4. Ajith S/o Shanmugam, No.15/9, Bajanai Kovil Street, Akkachikuppam Post, Chinnakudikonda, Vellore District. 5. Dillibabu S/o Chandraya Ceti, No.4/29, 1st Street,TNR Kandigai, S.Agraharam Post and Village, Tiruvallur District. 6. Bharath S/o Chandran, No.4/32, Muthal street, TNR Kandigai, S.Agraharam Post and Village, Tiruvallur District. ..Petitioner(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17661 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Vs 1. State of Tamil Nadu, Inspector of police Thiruthani Police Station, Tiruvallur District. Crime No.213 of 2026 2. Muthusami S/o Subramani, No.5/577, Perumal Kovil Street, Kodivalli Village, Thiruthani, Tiruvallur District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for records in Crime No.213 of 2026 pending on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the final report as against the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Saranraj For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran Government Counsel (Crl. Side) for R1 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash Crime No.213 of 2026 on the file of the 1st respondent Police for alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 281, 118(1) & 351(3) of BNS, on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17661 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.p.c. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The gist of facts leading to the instant case is that on account of the land dispute between the parties, it is alleged that the accused had followed the de facto complainant and also dashed him with their motorcycle and also taken away his two wheeler. Subsequently, the issue has been resolved between the parties. 4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. 5. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P. No. 17661 of 2026 stands allowed. The Crime No.213 of 2026 on the file of the 1st respondent Police stands quashed. 09-07-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No KKN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17661 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. KKN To 1.The Inspector of police Thiruthani Police Station, Tiruvallur District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. CRL OP No. 17661 of 2026 09-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis