Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4857 (GAU)

Deepak Gyadi and 5 Ors v. The State of AP and 8 Ors

Review Pet./2/2026 · 2026-02-26

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/5 GAHC040002342026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Review Pet./2/2026 Deepak Gyadi and 5 Ors Son of Shri K Gyadi, Assistant Engineer, Capital Complex Division, Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Miss Gopi Basar Age: Occupation : Daughter of T Migo Basa Assistant Engineer O/o The Chief Engineer (UD) Mowb-II Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 3: Gyati Tama Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Gyati Talle Assistant Engineer Raga Division Kamle District Arunachal Pradesh. 4: Techi Tapum Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Techi Ponung Assistant Engineer Itanagar Division Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 5: Techi Chuki Tara Page No.# 2/5 Age: Occupation : Son of Late Techi Kasu Assistant Engineer Raga Division Kamle District Arunachal Pradesh. 6: Kipa Amah Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Kipa Tania Assistant Engineer Yupia Division Yupia Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 8 Ors represented through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Chairman cum Chief Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : of the Departmental promotion Committee held on 07.08.2024 and 08.07.2025 at Civil Secretariat Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Urban Affairs Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 4:Jimu Mele Age: 0 Occupation : Assistant Engineer Roing Division Department of UD and Housing Lower Dibang Valley District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:Tate Nalo Age: 0 Page No.# 3/5 Occupation : Assistant Engineer Daporijo Division Department of UD and Housing Upper Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:Kaling Apang Age: 0 Occupation : Assistant Engineer Roing Division Department of UD and Housing C/o Chief Engineer Urban Development Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 7:G T Serthipa Age: 0 Occupation : Assistant Engineer Capital Complex Division Department of UD and Housing D K Convention Centre IG Park Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 8:Koncho Tsering Age: 0 Occupation : Assistant Engineer Roing Division Department of UD and Housing C/o Chief Engineer Urban Department Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 9:Goy Ketan Age: 0 Occupation : Assistant Engineer Department of UD and Housing C/o Chief Engineer Urban Development Page No.# 4/5 Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar Advocate for the Petitioner : Tabo Gyadi, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER Date : 27.02.2026 Heard Shri T. Gyadi, learned counsel for the applicants and Ms. T. Wangmu, learned State Counsel, A.P., who have appeared online. This is a matter pertaining to the Itanagar Bench and this application has been filed for review of an order dated 13.02.2026 passed in the connected WP(C)/415/2025. By the aforesaid order dated 13.02.2026, the writ petition was dismissed on withdrawal. The learned counsel for the applicants/writ petitioners has, however, submitted that due to inadvertence, the aspect of seeking liberty before making the prayer for withdrawal was left out and accordingly, the same has not been reflected in the aforesaid order dated 13.02.2026. He, accordingly submits that the aforesaid aspect of giving liberty may be incorporated in the order dated 13.02.2026. Ms. Wangmu, learned State Counsel does not seriously object to the aforesaid prayer. Considering the nature of the prayer made in this application, this Court is of the opinion that the order dated 13.02.2026 is liable to be modified by inserting the aspect of liberty to the petitioners. Page No.# 5/5 Accordingly, the review petition is allowed by observing that while the connected writ petition has been dismissed on withdrawal vide order dated 13.02.2026, liberty would be there for the applicants/writ petitioners to approach this Court for any grievance. The review petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant