Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040001522026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : PIL/1/2026 Iken Tao and 4 Ors Son of Shri Kari Tao, resident of Liru Village, PO and PS Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Binpi Doke Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Pekbin Doke resident of Village Lipu PO and PS Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 3: Lomi Karlo Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Talom Karlo resident of Village Garu PO and PS Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 4: Kenyom Zirdo Age: Occupation : Son of Late Boken Zirdo resident of Village Silli PO and PS Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 5: Igo Tao Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Goi Tao Page No.# 2/4 resident of Village Kane PO and PS Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The State of Arunachal Pradesh Age: 0 Occupation : represented by the Commissioner cum Secretary PWD Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : PWD Central Zone Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : PWD Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : PWD Gensi Division Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:The Deputy Commissioner cum Chairman Age: 0 Occupation : District Monitoring Committee Liakbali Lower Siang District PO and PS Likabali Page No.# 3/4 Arunachal Pradesh. 7:M/s IT Enterprise Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Shri Doi Tarak Son of Late Mardo Tarak Liru Village Likabali PO Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Khoda Tari, Marnya Ete,Toko Rini,Taku Pumbo,Dilip Saikia Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), :::BEFORE::: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE 28.04.2026 (M. Choudhury, J) -ORDER- Mr. T. Pumbo, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioner is waiting for further information, for which he has applied under the Right to Information Act, and he has submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw this PIL, with the liberty to file afresh. Mr. R. H. Nabam, learned Addl. Advocate General is in attendance. In view of the submission made by Mr. T. Pumbo, learned counsel for the petitioners, this PIL stands dismissed on withdrawal, with a liberty, as prayed Page No.# 4/4 for. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant