Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48558 (CAL)

JAYDUL HOQUE @ JAIDUL HAK @ ORS v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(A)/671/2026 · 2026-10-09

Rajasekhar Mantha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

09.10.2026 Court No.7 Item No.7 AP HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRM (A) 671 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Sahebganj Police Station Case No.302 of 2026 dated 18.06.2026 under Sections 329(4)/115(2)/117(2)/109/324(4)/326(g)/74/ 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of: Jaydul Hoque @ Jaidul Hak & Ors. …. Petitioners. Mr. Hillol Saha Podder …for the Petitioners. Mr. Janardan Periwal Mr. Debanjan Das Mr. Rajdeep Das …for the State. 1. In terms of this Court’s order dated 29th September, 2026 the petitioners visited the Investigating Officer on 3rd October, 2026. 2. The Officer-in-Charge, Sahebganj Police Station, Cooch Behar has filed a report dated 9th October, 2026 and the same is taken on record. 3. It appears from the report that the petitioners did not in any way cooperate with the Investigating Officer. 4. Learned counsel for the State submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is necessary. 5. In the light of the above, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)