Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2688 CRL.P No. 6373 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6373 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
S. VENKATESH S/O LATE SIDDAGANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O H.NO.18, 12TH CROSS, SWIMMING POOL EXTENSION, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560003, …PETITIONER (BY SMT. KAVITHA M.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. GURUDEV GACHHINAMATH, ADVOCATE) AND:
T N RADHA W/O S. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O MAVUKERE, KORA HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK AND DISTRICT-572128. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT - SD/-)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 17.06.2017 MADE IN CR.MISC.NO.88/2012 (CR.MISC.NO.127/2013) PASSED BY THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC, TUMKUR.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA
Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2688 CRL.P No. 6373 of 2017
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to retire from the above case.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. It is stated in the memo that, even though learned counsel has issued retirement notice to the petitioner, the same is unserved as no such person resides.
4. Petitioner called out. Absent. No representation. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
PNV CT:VS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 23