Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4853 (MAD)

Jamesh v. State rep. by The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/11625/2026 · 2026-05-06

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 11625 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-05-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL OP No. 11625 of 2026 Jamesh S/o.Vijayan, No.167, Karadigollapatti Village, Perugopanapalli Post, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Petitioner(s) Vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Bargur Police Station, Krishnagiri District. Crime No.103/2026 Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, to release the petitioner on bail in Crime No.103 of 2026 on the file of the respondent/police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.P.Saravanan For Respondent(s): Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.04.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 127(2), 310(2) & 311 of of BNS, in Crime No.103 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other co- accused threatened the defacto complainant with a knife and snatched a sum of Rs.10,000/- and a mobile phone from the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11625 of 2026 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner was arrested and is in judicial custody from 17.04.2026 and the petitioner has no previous case. Hence, seeks for bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that petitioner along with other co-accused threatened the defacto complainant with a knife and snatched a sum of Rs.10,000/- and a mobile phone from the defacto complainant. The investigation is at an initial stage and the co-accused is still absconding, at this stage, if the petitioner is released on bail, it will affect the investigation. Hence, vehemently opposed the bail. 5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances, nature and gravity of offences, the manner in which the offence alleged to have taken place, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed. 06-05-2026 dhk To 1.The Inspector of Police, Bargur Police Station, Krishnagiri District. Crime No.103/2026 2.Judicial Magistrate No.I, Krishnagiri https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11625 of 2026 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court 4.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Salem https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11625 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI J. dhk CRL OP No. 11625 of 2026 06-05-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis