Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4852 (JHR)

SHUBHAM KALINDI ALIAS BITTU KALINDI ALLIAS SUBHAM KALINDI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2891/2026 · 2026-04-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:10207] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2891 of 2026 ------ Shubham Kalindi @ Bittu Kalindi @ Subham Kalindi, aged about 27 years, son of Satish Kalindi, resident of Banadungri, P.O. + P.S.— Kandra, District- Saraikella-Kharsawan (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sahay Gaurav Piyush, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 09-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. No. 182/2025 (arising out of Kandra P.S. Case No. 19/2025) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 111, 308(4), 109, 317(4), 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 27, 35 and 25(6) of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to commit murder of the informant -Chitranjan Mandal, by firing upon him, causing bullet injury on the body of the victim. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Apart from this case, petitioner is also involved in two other cases. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that keeping in view of serious nature of allegation against the petitioner, there is every chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with evidence, if released on bail. It is therefore submitted that the petitioner ought not be released on bail. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner and the chance of the petitioner absconding or tampering with evidence, if released on bail, this Court is not inclined to admit the petitioner on bail at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the above-named petitioner is rejected at this stage. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 09/04/2026 Amar/