6 0099..1100..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 26921 of 2026 Sunil Kumar Ray Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Samim Ahammed Mr. Arka Maiti Ms. Gulsanwara Pervin …for the petitioner Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Ld. AAG Mr. Pijush Biswas Mr. Aditya Mondal …for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. By presenting this writ petition allegations are made against investigating officer of Bhatar Police Station Case No. 461 of 2026 dated 2nd September, 2026. A case is made out by lodging complaint dated 12th September, 2026 before the concerned police authority that steps were not taken in connection with aforesaid criminal prosecution for recording statements under Section 183 BNSS, 2023. 3. Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, learned Additional Advocate General representing State respondents has disputed the case made out in the writ petition based on communication dated 27th September, 2026 of Officer-in- Charge, Bhatar Police Station, Purba 2 Bardhaman, same is placed before this Court and taken on record. Copy of same is made over to learned advocate representing petitioner. 4. It is disclosed in the communication that statements of petitioner, petitioner’s wife and son under Section 180 BNSS, 2023 were recorded on 5th September, 2026 and subsequently statements were recorded under Section 183 BNSS, 2023 before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Burdwan on 17th September, 2026. Medical reports in order to ascertain injury sustained by petitioner and his wife are also obtained. It is further disclosed in the communication dated 27th September, 2026 analytical report of CDR suggests presence of persons using particular mobile number at different place. However, it is not the stage when such issue needs not be dilated. 5. In view of disclosure of facts it is found that steps have been taken by investigating officer while investigating aforesaid criminal prosecution. At this stage no direction is warranted. 6. Writ petition stands disposed of. 3 7. However, concerned police authorities are directed to expedite investigation and take the same to its logical conclusion. 8. Since no affidavits are called for allegations contained in writ petition are deemed to have been denied and disputed. 9. Parties to act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)