Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48510 (CAL)

NIYAMAT ALI KHAN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/3447/2026 · 2026-10-09

Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

09.10.2026 Item No.35 Court No.37 (Bench ID-265691) CHC Allowed In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.(A) 3447 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Bagnan Police Station Case No. 663 of 2026 dated 23.08.2026 under Sections 329(4)/ 326(2)/ 118(2)/ 351(2)/ 117(2)/110/303(2)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending before the Court of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Uluberia, Howrah. And In the matter of : Niyamat Ali Khan ...… petitioner Mr. Tanmay Chowdhury, Advocate Ms. Ritoprita Ghosh, Advocate Ms. Sulagna Sarkar, Advocate .…for the petitioner Mr. Kalidas Saha, Advocate Mr. Arijit Bhusan Bagchi, Advocate .…for the State 1. Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail. 2. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 3. Three persons suffered injuries in an incident of assault. 4. None of the injuries are classified as grievous hurt. 5. One of the injured suffered cut injury over forehead and small abrasion and the other injured suffered bruise injuries. The third suffered swollen right hand and bruise under left eye. 2 6. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and on condition that petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a month till the conclusion of investigation and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. 8. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. 9. CRM(A) 3447 of 2026 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.09 18:47:01 +05'30'