Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48501 (MAD)

Asiya Parveen v. The Superintendent of Police

CRL OP/17547/2026 · 2026-07-08

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 17547 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 17547 of 2026 Asiya Parveen, W/o Riyasudheen, Now Residing at, No.13/4, R.M.Meena Flats, Teachers Colony 1st Street, Nanganallur, Chennai. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent, 9C, Subramaniyapuram, Arupathimoovarpettai, Mayiladuthurai. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Polagam, Sirkazhi Circle, Mayiladuthurai. 3. The Inspector Of Police All Women Police Station - Sirkazhi, Mayiladuthurai. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, 2023, to transfer the entire investigation pertaining to Crime in FIR No.30 of 2026 dated 08.06.2026 pending on the file of the 3rd respondent police to the Inspector of Police, CBCID, or any other competent authority and to pass such other orders. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17547 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.Ma.P.Thangavel For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran Government Counsel (Crl. Side) for R1 to R3 ORDER Considering the nature of allegations made and the fact that FIR is also registered on 08.06.2026, the prayer to transfer the investigation cannot be granted. However, the 3rd respondent shall strictly proceed with the investigation and the 2nd respondent / Deputy Superintendent of Police shall also monitor the same. 2. It is seen that even though clear cut allegations are made, the case is not even registered under Section 4 of Women Harassment Act. Therefore, the 2nd respondent shall consider the entire issue which happened so far and monitor the investigation on day to day basis. 3. It is also submitted that the de facto complaint has now moved to Chennai and has got serious threat. As far as Sirkali is concerned, the same shall be borne in mind by the investigating authorities and, if the presence of the de facto complainant is necessary at Sirkali, due protection for her life and liberty can be given and otherwise if any interrogation has to be made, the same can also be made at Chennai also. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17547 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 08-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No KKN To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent, 9C, Subramaniyapuram, Arupathimoovarpettai, Mayiladuthurai. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Polagam, Sirkazhi Circle, Mayiladuthurai. 3. The Inspector Of Police All Women Police Station - Sirkazhi, Mayiladuthurai. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17547 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. KKN CRL OP No. 17547 of 2026 08-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis