BADAL GORAI ALIAS BADAL GORAIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1499/2026 · 2026-03-11
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 485 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 485 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:6456 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 1499 of 2026
Badal Gorai @ Badal Gorain, aged about 37 years, Son of Vishwanath Gorai, resident of Narayan Kulhi, Pradhankhanta, P.O. Pradhankhanta, P.S. Baliapur, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Ms. Ashwini Priya, Advocate
For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, Advocate
---
05/11.03.2026
1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 05.03.2024 in connection with Session Trial No. 366 of 2024 arising out of Baliapur P.S. Case No. 188 of 2022, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 302, 120(B), 201 of Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge- I, Dhanbad.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that it was petitioner who had threatened the son of the informant earlier and ultimately the son of the informant was killed. He has also submitted that out of 10 witnesses, 8 witnesses have already been examined till 04.12.2025 and the trial is at the fag end. He has also submitted that only the informant and the investigating office are required to be examined.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the trial is at fag end, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. This bail application is accordingly rejected.
2026:JHHC:6456 2
7. However, the State is directed to ensure prompt production of witnesses.
8.
Learned counsel for the State is directed to communicate this
order to the Director, Prosecution as well as Superintendent of Police of the concerned district.
9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 11.03.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-11.03.2026