SINGAMSETTY HARI SANKAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/17797/2026 · 2026-07-05
Nyapathy Vijay
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4848 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4848 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : --- Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of uploading
:
APHC010335752026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 17797/2026 Between:
1. SINGAMSETTY HARI SANKAR, S/O. THIRUVENGALAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, UN-EMPLOYEE, R/O 39-455/4-5, ROAD NO.14 OM SANTHI NAGAR, KADAPA TOWN, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. SI. NO 483, PIN CODE - 516001
2. NAGAM PRATHAP REDDY, S/O. SUBBA REDDY, AGED 35 YEARS, UN-EMPLOYEE R/O RK NAGAR, MADAKAVARI PALLE, BADVEL MANDAL, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. SI. NO 7581, PIN CODE - 516227
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES ( R AND R) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. PINCODE.520002
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, NTR TELUGU GANGA PROJECT,
TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR( TIRUPATI)
2
DISTRICT.PINCODE.517507
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , YSR DISTRICT, KADAPA PINCODE.516001
4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SOMASILA PROJECT, DARGAMITTA, SPS NELLORE DISTRICT PINCODE.524301
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to pas orders in exercise of extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the respondents inaction in providing employment to the petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 98 Irrigation Department Dt. 15.4.1986 though their names were included in the list published @ http//kadapa.ap.nic.in on 6.4.2023
as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and violative of right to life. Article 14, 19, 21 and 300 A of the of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider his candidature for employment at par with the candidates mentioned in Memo No. 7477081/R and R/A2/2023-7 (C.No. 2116015) dt. 30.6.2025 and Progs. SE/SKDGNSS7KDP/AB/EC.2/E20/260 M/259 M dt.22.4.2026 and grant such other relief as may be deemed just and necessary in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to consider petitioner’s candidature for providing employment in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 98 Irrigation Department Dt. 15.4.1986 by extending the benefit at part with the candidates mentioned in Memo No.
7477081/R& R/A2/2023-7 (C.No. 2116015) dt. 30.6.2025& Progs. SE/SKDGNSS7KDP/AB/EC/ AB/ CE.2/E20/260 M/259
3
M& 259 M dt. 22.4.2026.
pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. MADAMALA VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following:
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.17797 of 2026 O R D E R:
1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the inaction of the Respondents in not providing employment to the Petitioners in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (PROJ. WING) Department, dated 15.04.1986, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The lands of the parents of the Petitioners were acquired at Kotapadu, Atluru villages, for the purpose of the Somasila Project in-between the years 1986-1994. As per G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (PROJ. WING) Department, dated 15.04.1986, employment was to be offered to the members of the displaced families or their dependents. The Petitioners, being the dependents of the original landowners, applied for employment in terms of the said G.O. However, though their names were reflected in the shortlisted eligible persons, their cases were not considered for employment. Hence, this Writ Petition is filed. 3.
Learned counsel for the Petitioners relies on the
Judgment of this Court in W.P.No.40372 of 2018 and batch,
5
and W.P.No.3445 of 2020, wherein employment was directed to be offered to the dependents of the landowners therein, and seeks similar relief in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the land acquisition took place in-between the years 1986-1994 and, despite the lapse of more than 30 years, employment has still not been provided.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that cases of the Petitioners will be considered and necessary action will be initiated for providing employment in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98 dated 15.04.1986, as per the rules in force.
5. Considering the fact that the lands of the Petitioners were acquired way back in-between the years 1986-1994, the delay in providing employment cannot be justified; more so, as the employment was to be treated as part of the promised compensation.
6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the Respondents to consider the cases of the Petitioners for employment on par with similarly placed persons, as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs.
6
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 06.07.2026 chs
Whether the order is: Speaking ✔ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ✔
7
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 61
WRIT PETITION NO:17797/2026 Dt. 06.07.2026
chs