HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30545 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Prashant Kumar, learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Rajdeep Kumar to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 60 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 131, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 117(2) BNS, P.S.- Lalpur/Pandeypur, District- Varanasi, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in F.I.R. dated 27.02.2026 lodged by the friend of injured Rahul Singh for alleged assault committed by the accused-applicant. The F.I.R. is against four named and one anonymous persons. Further contended that the accused-applicant is the owner of the ground which was used to be given on rent for playing cricket. The injured had booked the field for playing cricket on 26.02.2026 for 6 to 9 p.m. Despite expiry of time, the ground was not vacated. At about 10:15 p.m., on the direction of the owner of the field, the accused-applicant and other staff members went to switch off the light of the field, which was the point of contention between the parties. The applicant being the owner of the field came and there was altercation between them when Rahul Singh, the injured suffered one injury on his head, which came out to be fracture of the frontal bone. There is no criminal history. The charge sheet is submitted. The applicant is in jail since 01.03.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neetu Singh, Nishant Kumar, Prashant Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajdeep Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Learned A.G.A. for the State has opposed the bail application, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considered the arguments made by learned counsel for the applicant that the field which is in the name of M.S. Cricket Academy and given for the time being to the injured for playing cricket and after expiry of time, he was asked to vacate the field. The charge sheet is submitted. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 8, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 30545 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad