Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48458 (MAD)

Thirumal v. The State represented by the Inspector of Police

CRL OP/18224/2026 · 2026-07-13

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 18224 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 18224 of 2026 Thirumal S/o.Kumaravel, 123, Cuddalore Main Road, Sailom, Thirukoilur, Villupuram - 605757. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State represented by the Inspector of Police Thirukoilur Police Station, Kallakurichi. Crime no.316 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under section 483 of BNSS, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime no.316 of 23026 pending investigation on the file of Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): M/S. Nithya K For Respondent(s): MR.S.YOGARAJA SEKAR, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE ) ORDER The petitioner, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 25.06.2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 304(2) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.316 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18224 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has committed theft of cell phone from the defacto complainant. Hence the case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent would fairly submits that this is a case of theft of cell phone. He further submits that the stolen property has been recovered. He further submitted that the petitioner has no previous cases against him. However, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 5.From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), it is seen that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, the stolen property has been recovered and that the petitioner has been under incarceration since 25.06.2026, this Court is of the firm view that his further custody is not necessary for the purpose of investigation. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18224 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirukoilur, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18224 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 13-07-2026 DRL Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To 1.The Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirukoilur. 2. The Inspector of Police Thirukoilur Police Station, Kallakurichi. 3.The Superintendent, District Prison Vedampattu, Villupuram. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18224 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 18224 of 2026 13-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis