08.10.2026 Item No.102 Court No.37 (Bench ID-265691) CHC Rejected In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.(A) 3425 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Balurghat Police Station vide First Information Report Case No. 455 of 2026 dated 04.07.2026 under Sections 85/ 316(2)/318(2)/336(2)/338/ 351(2)/108/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of: Manasi Roy @ Munna @ Manashi Das Roy & Anr. ...… petitioners Ms. Sangeeta Roy, Advocate Mr. Chandra Prakash, Advocate Ms. Monalisa Maity, Advocate .…for the petitioners Mr. Parmanand Sharma, Advocate Mr. Biswajit Tiwari, Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate …for the State 1. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail. 2. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 3. Victim left behind a dying declaration implicating the petitioners. 4. Apparently, there was a ration-shop which initially belonged to the husband of the victim. Thereafter, of his death, the petitioner no.2 used to look after such ration-shop. Dying declaration states that, petitioner no.2 misappropriated the entire income of such ration shop without making over any payment to the victim. Consequently, she committed suicide. 2 5. Considering the involvement of the petitioners in the incident, I am unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. 7. CRM(A) 3425 of 2026 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.09 18:53:51 +05'30'