Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4845 (UTT)

PRAKASH KAUR v. UNION OF INDIA

WPMS/3690/2025 · 2026-01-02

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:2 1 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 3690 of 2025 02 January, 2026 Prakash Kaur and Others --Petitioners Versus Union Of India and Others --Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, learned counsel for petitioners. Mr. Atul Bhatt, learned C.G.S.C. for Union of India/ respondent No.1. Mr. Naresh Pant (through V.C.), learned counsel with Mr. Raunak Pant, learned counsel for respondent No.2/N.H.A.I. Mr. K.S. Mehta, learned Additional C.S.C. with Mr. Bhupendra Koranga, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent No.3. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral) This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court for a direction to learned District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, to expedite the disposal of Arbitration Case No.07 of 2023 Smt. Prakash Kaur and Others Vs. Union of India and Others, within a time frame fixed by this Court. 2. It is the contended by learned counsel for petitioners that the arbitration proceedings were launched between the parties which resulted into an arbitration award dated 26.02.2021. It is further contended by him that an application was moved by petitioners under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, before the learned District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, which was registered as Arbitration Case No.07 of 2023 Smt. Prakash Kaur and Others Vs. Union of India and Others, for challenging the award, whereby, the enhancement of compensation was denied to the petitioners. 2026:UHC:2 2 3. Learned counsel for petitioners further submits that pleadings of the parties have already been exchanged in the said Arbitration Case, and therefore, only argument is left to be done. He also submits that the said Arbitration Case is pending since 2023. He requested a direction to be issued to learned District Judge, District Udham Singh Nagar, to expedite the disposal of aforesaid Arbitration Case No.07 of 2023 Smt. Prakash Kaur and Others Vs. Union of India and Others. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection if such a direction be issued to learned District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar. 5. Since, right of speedy justice is a fundamental right accrued in favour of petitioners in view of the constitution scheme, and therefore, the petitioners can claim for matter to be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Thus, learned counsel for petitioners has succeeded in making out a case for a direction to be issued to learned District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid Arbitration Case. 6. Accordingly, present writ petition is allowed. Learned District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, is hereby directed to decide the Arbitration Case No.07 of 2023 Smt. Prakash Kaur and Others Vs. Union of India and Others, expeditiously but not later than six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 02.01.2026 PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe383 31bac55c78b5f9f0276c16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FA E064498483A83D84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2026.01.02 16:12:09 +05'30'