Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4845 (CAL)

RAMA PAUL v. KRISHNA KUNDU

CO/4566/2025 · 2026-01-28

Shampa Sarkar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item No.369 28.01.2026 Court. No. 6 GB C.O. 4566 of 2025 Smt. Rama Paul Vs. Sri Krishna Kundu Mr. Abhijit Ray, Mr. Santu Nandu … for the Petitioner. 1. By this application, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Title Suit No.376 of 2024 along with the connected applications, which are pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Bidhannagar, North 24 Parganas. 2. Considering the submissions, the Court is of the view that the prayer of the petitioner is innocuous. Neither party stands to lose if a proceeding is disposed of expeditiously. In fact, such expeditious disposal shall enure to the benefit of the parties. Hence, there is no requirement for service of prior notice upon the opposite party. 3. The revisional application is disposed of with a direction upon the learned court to dispose of the applications expeditiously, preferably within a month from the next date fixed. Adequate opportunity shall be given to the parties to contest the same. 4. This court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the applications. The learned court shall proceed independently and in accordance with law. 2 5. A copy of this revisional application along with a copy of this order be served upon the opposite party as also upon the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the opposite party in the learned trial court. 6. The revisional application is accordingly disposed of. 7. There shall be no order as to costs. 8. Parties are to act on the server copy of this order. (Shampa Sarkar, J.)