Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48447 (MAD)

S.Lakshmi v. The Superintendent of Police

CRL OP/17608/2026 · 2026-07-08

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 17608 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 17608 of 2026 S.Lakshmi, W/o Subramanian, D.No.11/44, Chetti Thoppur Vayal, West Chithirai Chavadi, Thaliyur, Coimbatore. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Vadavalli, Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of Police, Thondamuthur Police Station, Coimbatore. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to transfer the investigation in Crime No.270 of 2025 from the file of the 3rd respondent to some other independent investigation agency or officer for conducting independent and impartial investigation in Crime No.270 of 2025 in the file of the 3rd respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Sudhakar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran Government Counsel (Crl. Side) for R1 to R3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17608 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The prayer in the Criminal Original Petition is to transfer the investigation in Crime No. 270 of 2025 on the file of the 3rd respondent to some other investigating agency. 2. The petitioner is the mother. Her allegation is that the her son falsely represented that he has arranged for a loan and requested the petitioner to come to the Sub-Registrar office to execute a mortgage. Believing his son, she went to the Sub-Registrar Office and signed the document. However, subsequently she realised that it is a settlement deed. After that, in order to make the matter fait accompli, the son also further seems to have executed a mortgage deed only for a sum of Rs.10,000/-. Therefore, the above complaint was lodged and case in Crime No.270 of 2025 was registered for the alleged offences under Section 296(b), 351(3) and 318(4) of BNS. There is absolutely no action has been taken and hence, the petitioner is before this court. 3. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that the investigation in this case is complete and they have concluded that the case is a mistake of fact. Due RCS notice will be served on the petitioner within one week from today and thereafter, the report will be filed before the learned Magistrate. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17608 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. In view thereof, the prayer made to transfer the investigation cannot be countenanced and, as such, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed off, kept open the liberty for the petitioner to file such protest petition before the learned Magistrate. 08-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No KKN 1. The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Vadavalli, Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of Police, Thondamuthur Police Station, Coimbatore. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17608 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. KKN CRL OP No. 17608 of 2026 08-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis