Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48438 (KAR)

UMESH v. H K VENKATASWAMY

MFA/3064/2019 · 2026-02-02

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5792 MFA No. 3064 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3064 OF 2019 (CPC) BETWEEN: UMESH S/O MUTHAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/A NO.4, SRI BALAJI NILAYA, RAGHAVENDRA TEMPLE ROAD, HULIMAVU, BANGALORE-560 076 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. CHETHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. H K VENKATASWAMY S/O KEMPANNA REDDY, AGED MAJOR, RESIDING AT NO.77, 3RD MAIN, BTM II STAGE, N.S.PALYA, BANGALORE-560 076 2. SRI TEJAS, S/O H.K.VENKATASAWAMY, AGED MAJOR, RESIDING AT NO.77, 3RD MAIN, BTM II STAGE, N.S.PALYA, BANGALORE-560076. 3. SRI MOHAN KUMAR S/O D KESHAVA NAIDU, AGED MAJOR, AGED 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.47/1, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5792 MFA No. 3064 of 2019 CHAY POINT, 1ST FLOOR, SUBBARAMACHETTY ROAD, NETKALAPPA CIRCLE, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE-560 004. 4. SRI JAYRAM CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AGED MAJOR, HULIMAVU POLICE STATION, PRESENTLY VIDHANA SOUDHA SECURITY, BANGALORE 5. SRI VEERABHABRE GOWDA ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, AGED MAJOR, MICO LAYOUT DIVISION, JAYANAGAR, PRESENTLY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (COD), CARLTON HOUSE, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI PRASHANTH K.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RADHANANDAN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 AND R4 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; VIDE ORDER DATED 23.04.205, NOTICE IN RESPECT OF R3 AND R5 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5792 MFA No. 3064 of 2019 ORAL JUDGMENT Sri.Chetan Kumar, counsel for the appellant and Sri.Prashanth K.S., counsel on behalf of Sri.Radhanandan B.S., for respondent No.1 appeared in person. 2. Sri.Chetan Kumar, counsel submits that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the appeal. 4. The submission is placed on record. 5. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37