WP Crl. No. 1591 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 1591 of 2026 J.Sridharan S/o.Jeganathan, Thandarai Village, Kandachipuram Taluk, Villupuram District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State represented by The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 2. The State represented by The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 3. T.Devanathan Yadav S/o.Thiruvenkadam, Door No.3, Deenadhayalu Street, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017. 4. Sudha W/o.T.Devanathan Yadav, Door No.3, Deenadhayalu Street, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017. 5. R.Sampath S/o.Renganathan, Village President, Thandarai Village, Kandachipuram Taluk, Villupuram District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1591 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 6. S.Mariyadas Advocate, Door NO.3, Deenadhayalu Street, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for issuance of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing respondents No.1 and 2 to take appropriate action as against the respondents No.3 to 6 on the basis of the petitioners representation dated 23.5.2026 submitted to the respondents 1 and 2 directly in person and pass such further or other orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper and in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): M/s.K.Semmalai For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government ORDER This petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents No.1 and 2 to take appropriate action as against the respondents No.3 to 6 on the basis of the petitioners representation dated 23.5.2026 submitted to the respondents 1 and 2 directly in person. 2. The learned Government Counsel on instructions would submit that so far the 2nd respondent did not receive any complaint. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1591 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 3. This Court is of the view that the 2nd respondent is not a direct jurisdiction to receive the complaint. If any complaint forwarded to 2nd respondent by other Superior Officer, it will be taken into consideration for enquiry. Therefore, the prayer sought for in this petition cannot be considered. However, petitioner is at liberty to lodge a fresh complaint before the jurisdictional police. 4. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 08-07-2026 SMA To 1. The State represented by The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 2. The State represented by The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 3. The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1591 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. SMA WP Crl. No. 1591 of 2026 08-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis