Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4843 (BOM)

TINKU RAJENDRAPRASAD KUMAWAT v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABA/338/2026 · 2026-08-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

945-ABA-338-2026.odt Harish IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 338 OF 2026 Tinku Rajendraprasad Kumawat ...Applicant V/S. State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Adv. Vinayak Patil, for the Petitioner. Adv. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent – State. Adv. Prashant Pandey a/w Dinesh J., Riddhima Mangaonkar, Neha B. i/b Hmant Shukla, for the Intervenor. API – Mr. Vinayak Jadhav, Navghar Police Station is present. ________________________________________________________ CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. DATE : 28TH AUGUST, 2026. P.C. :- 1. After arguing the matter for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application. Permission granted. 2. The Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) 1/1