Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4843 (AP)

Gunji Srinivasa Rao, v. Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam,

WP/13302/2010 · 2026-07-02

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : 13.07.2026 APHC010574402010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13302/2010 Between: 1. GUNJI SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, EMPLOYEE, R/O. TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAM, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER-CUM-PRESIDENT, TTD EMPLOYEES CO-OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. TIRUPATI. 2. T T D EMPLOYEES COOP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER 3. C MOHAN MURALI, S/O. MUNIRATNAM, JUNIOR ASST. TTT EMPLOYEES CO-OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. TIRUPATI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 &2 in not finalising the seniority list in the cadre of Lower Division Clerks/Junior Assistants in the office of the 2nd respondent and taking further steps to fill up the posts of the Senior Assistants' without fixing the seniority in the cadre of LDC/Junior Assistant as illegal, arbitrary consequently directing the respondents 1 & 2 to 2 JS,J W.P.No.13302/2010 prepare the seniority list in the said cedres and till such process is completed not to take up the process of promoting any Junior Assistant to the post of Senior Assistant IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 16776 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respodnents not to fill up the vacancy of the Senior Assistant in the Office of the 2nd respondent without considering the case of seniority of the petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P V S S S RAMA RAO 2. A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO 3 JS,J W.P.No.13302/2010 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter dated 30.06.2026 before the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 03.07.2026 RSD Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑ 4 JS,J W.P.No.13302/2010 121 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13302/2010 Dated: 03.07.2026 RSD