Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4841 (MAD)

Manikandan v. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/11673/2026 · 2026-05-06

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 11673 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-05-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL OP No. 11673 of 2026 Manikandan S/o.Ranganathan, 5/184, Vada ponmudi pirivu, St Joseph School, Jadayampalayam, Coimbatore District - 641 302 Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Annur Police Station, Coimbatore District. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.84 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Arunkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.02.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 331(3), 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner break opened the defacto complainant' house door and committed theft of gold ornaments from the house of the defacto complainant's house and escaped from the place of occurrence. Hence, the complaint. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11673 of 2026 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner was arrested and is in judicial custody from 08.02.2026 and submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions imposed by the Court. Hence, seeks for bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that petitioner is an habitual offender and is having 5 other cases. At this stage, if the petitioner is released on bail, there is high chance of absconding from the case, tampering of the prosecution witnesses. Hence, vehemently opposed the bail. 5.Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances, nature and gravity of offences, the manner in which the offence alleged to have taken place, the stage of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed. 06-05-2026 dhk To 1. The Inspector of Police Annur Police Station, Coimbatore District. 2.The District Munsif-cum-Judicial https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11673 of 2026 Magistrate, Annur 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court 4.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11673 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI J. dhk CRL OP No. 11673 of 2026 06-05-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis