BIKASH MAHESH AND ANR v. DHUMAL PRATIK ASHOK SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER CONTAI SUB DIVISION
CPAN/1934/2025 · 2026-10-09
Aniruddha Roy
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48403 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48403 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
09.10.2026
In The High Court at Calcutta Ct. No. 38
Special Civil Jurisdiction Sl. No. 10
Appellate Side Contempt Moumita
CPAN 1934 of 2025 in WPA 21815 of 2023
Bikas Mahesh & Anr. Vs. Dhumal Pratik Ashok, The Sub-Divisional Officer, Contai Sub-Division, Purba Medinipur
Mr. Anindya Sundar Das, Adv. Mr. Shaunak Ghosh, Adv. Ms. Paramita Mondal, Adv. Mr. Suman Halder, Adv. ……...For the Petitioners Mr. Nilanjan Bhattacharjee, Ld. Senior Standing Counsel Ms. Jayita Dhar Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Joy Ranjan Dhar, Adv.
….For the alleged contemnor
Affidavit-of-service, filed in Court today, is taken on record.
Mr. Shaunak Ghosh, learned Advocate appears for the petitioners.
Ms. Jayita Dhar Chakraborty, learned Advocate led by Mr. Nilanjan Bhattacharjee, learned Senior Standing Counsel appears for the alleged contemnor.
Learned Advocate for the alleged contemnor has filed a report dated July 20, 2026 issued under the signature of the alleged contemnor, the same is taken on record. Copy has been served upon the learned Advocate for the petitioner in
2 Court today. The report shows that the alleged contemnor has passed its order.
This court has not expressed any opinion on the correctness, tenor or worthiness of the order passed by the alleged contemnor, the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the same, if so advised, in accordance with law.
Accordingly, since compliance has been made, the contempt proceeding CPAN 1934 of 2025 stands dropped and closed.
The application CPAN 1934 of 2025 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs.
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)