Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48381 (CAL)

SK. IMRAN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/3379/2026 · 2026-10-08

Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.10.2026 DL-58 Court No.37 [Bench ID-265691] (AD) (Rejected) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. (A) 3379 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with PTN No. WBML010 029922026 arising out of Manikchak Police Station Case No.303 of 2026 dated 20.05.2026 under Sections 85/109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now this case is pending before the Learned Sessions Judge, Malda. And In the matter of: Sk Imran ….petitioner Mr. Kalidas Saha, Advocate Mr. Khushi Mollick, Advocate Mr. Pikesh Kumar Chauhan, Advocate …for the petitioner Mr. Ranjan Chakraborti, Advocate Mr. Abhijit Singh, Advocate … for the State 1. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Petitioner stands implicated in an incident of assault. 3. Petitioner assaulted his wife. 4. Injury suffered by the victim is apparently a fracture on the nose. 5. Victim identified the petitioner as the assailant. 6. Neighbours corroborate the version of the victim. 7. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner in the incident, I am unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. 9. C.R.M. (A) 3379 of 2026 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.09 10:22:56 +05'30'