[2026:RJ-JP:11564] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4780/2026 Au Small Finance Bank Limited, (Erstwhile Au Financiers India Limited) Having Its Registered Office At 19-A, Dhuleshwar Garden, Ajmer Road, Jaipur Through Its Authorized Officer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Secretariat, Jaipur 3. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Shri. Veer Teja Printer (Borrower), Through Its Proprietor R/o State Bank Of India Atm Tejaji Mandir Ke Samne, District Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303313. 6. Moti Ram Yadav (Co-Borrower), R/o Pichakodiya Jaipur Pichakodiya District Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303328. 7. Smt. Mamta Yadav (Co- Borrower), R/o 41, Sujya Ki Dhani Pichakodiya District Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303328 8. Ajay Kumar S/o Motiram (Co- Borrower), Pichakodiya Jaipur, Sujya Ki Dhani Pichakodiya District Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303328 9. Ram Narayan S/o Bodu Ram Co- Borrower, R/o Pichakodiya Mundoti District Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303328. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Kumar Palsaniya Mr. Vikash Meena Mr. Devang Jharwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sunita Meena and Ms. Devakriti Vashishtha for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG [2026:RJ-JP:11564] (2 of 3) [CW-4780/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 18/03/2026 1. Issue notice to the respondents No.1 to 4. 2. Ms. Sunita Meena, Advocate, and Ms. Devakriti Vashishtha, Advocate, appearing for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, learned AAG, puts in appearance on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4. 3. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the controversy raised in the present writ petition stands duly covered by an order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14449/2025 dated 30.10.2025, titled as Tyger Home Finance Private Limited Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., the operative part of which reads as under: “7. Admittedly, there is no provision under Section 14 of the 'Act of 2002' which may authorize the learned Magistrate to direct the secured creditor to deposit any expenses of police assistance in taking possession of the secured asset. 8.In that view of the matter, the direction given to the petitioner for depositing the expenses of police assistance vide impugned order dated 12.08.2024 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alwar is hereby set aside. 9.The petitioner is directed to move execution application before the concerned police authorities to comply with the impugned order dated 12.08.2024 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alwar and the police authorities are directed to [2026:RJ-JP:11564] (3 of 3) [CW-4780/2026] comply with the aforesaid order dated 12.08.2024 at the earliest. 10.With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. 11.Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of” 4. In light of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of with directions to respondents No.1 to 4 to ensure immediate compliance of the order dated 30.05.2025 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur, and to provide necessary police assistance to the petitioner within a period of fifteen days from the date of service of the certified copy of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DIPESH CHAYAL /11