Crl.O.P.Nos.18147 & 18190 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.Nos.18147 & 18190 of 2026 Naveenkumar ... Petitioner in Crl.OP.NO.18147 of 2026 Sathiyarasu ... Petitioner in Crl.OP.NO.18190 of 2026 Vs. The State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Krishnagiri Taluk Police Station, Krishnagiri ... Respondent(s) in both petitions Crime No.397 of 2025 Common Prayer: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.397 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.L.Ramanathan (in Crl.OP.No.18147/2026) Mr.D.Arun (in Crl.OP.No.18190/2026) For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 29.09.2025 for the alleged offences under Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 @ Sections 332(a), 305(a), 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.397 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.Nos.18147 & 18190 of 2026 2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioners, for the purpose of extorting money, had done away with the deceased as well as her daughter. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioners have been in custody since 29.09.2025 and are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. He would further submit that initially Act 14 was invoked against the petitioners and was subsequently revoked, which fact was not seriously disputed by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side). He would also submit that the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, which fact was also not seriously disputed by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side). Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioners, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.18147 of 2026 has one previous case and the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.18190 of 2026 has no previous case. However, he fairly submitted that a major portion of the investigation has already been completed. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.Nos.18147 & 18190 of 2026 5. Considering the totality of the circumstances, particularly the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioners, the fact that a major portion of the investigation has already been completed, and also the fact that the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail, subject to certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Krishnagiri, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders; [c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.Nos.18147 & 18190 of 2026 appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioners thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 13.07.2026 skr Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.Nos.18147 & 18190 of 2026 To 1. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Krishnagiri 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Salem 3. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Coimbatore 4. The Inspector of Police, Krishnagiri Taluk Police Station, Krishnagiri 5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.Nos.18147 & 18190 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,J. skr Crl.O.P.Nos.18147 & 18190 of 2026 13.07.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis