- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2134 RSA No. 1016 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1016 OF 2024 (SP) BETWEEN: SRI. K. NAGARAJ, S/O KANAPPAMUDALIAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NEAR ESWARAN TEMPLE SOMESHWARA BLOCK, OORGAUM POST, KGF &APPELLANT (BY SRI NAGARAJ K C., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT. B.S. PREMAKUMARI, W/O T M KRISHNAGOWDA DEAD BY LRS: (a) T M KRISHNA GOWDA H/OLATE B S PREMA KUMARI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS (b) SMT SUMA D/O LATE T M KRISHNA GOWDA AND B S PREMA KUMARI (c) MISS SUDHA D/O LATE T M KRISHNA GOWDA AND B S PREMA KUMARI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESPTS.NO.1 (a) TO (c) ARE R/A SRINIVASA COMPOUND DOOR NO 59, OORGAUM POST, KGF - 563 120. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2134 RSA No. 1016 of 2024 2. SRI G PANDURANGAN S/O GANAPATHY DEAD BY LRS: (a) SMT USHA RANI W/O LATE G PANDURANGAN AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS (b) SMT P. AJITHA, D/O LATE G PANDURANGAN W/O M SRINIVASAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS (c) SMT P VIJAYA D/O LATE G PANDURANGAN W/O M MANIVANNAN AGED ABOUT 41 YEAR S RESPTS.NO.2(a) to (c) ARE RESIDING AT NO 483, NEW PATEL STREET OORGAUM POST. K GF - 563120 &RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.01.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.49/2022 ON THE FILE OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, KOLAR (SITTING AT KGF)., DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 4.03.2022 PASSED IN OS NO.64/2013 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KGF., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2134 RSA No. 1016 of 2024 ORAL ORDER This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for 7th time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE PSG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 97