Arb Appln No. 898 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Arb Appln No. 898 of 2026 M/s.Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co Ltd, ‘Chola Crest’, C 54 and 55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai. ..Applicant Vs 1. M/s.Om Sai Tours and Travels, Prop. Mr.Santhosh Ganpat More Panchmarg Popharan Road, Near Parshuram Mandir, Pachmarg, Popharan Thane, Palghar, Boisar, Maharashtra – 401 502. 2. Department of Atomic Energy, Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited, Boisar, Dist Palghar, Maharashtra – 401 504. ..Respondents Judge’s Summon filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules, read with Section 9(1)(ii)(a)(b)(d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to pass an order prohibiting the Garnishee from making payment of a sum of Rs.26,73,765.19 or any amount to the Respondent or to respondent’s men, agents, representatives or to anyone claiming on respondent behalf and restrain the respondent or respondent’s men, agents, representatives or anyone claiming on respondent behalf from receiving a sum of Rs.26,73,765.19 or any amount from the Garnishee and further direct the Garnishee to deposit the sum of Rs.26,73,765.19 or any amount to the credit of the above application. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 898 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Pradeep Kumar For Respondent(s): No appearance ORDER This application has been filed to pass an order prohibiting the Garnishee from making payment of a sum of Rs.26,73,765.19 or any amount to the Respondent or to respondent’s men, agents, representatives or to anyone claiming on respondent behalf and restrain the respondent or respondent’s men, agents, representatives or anyone claiming on respondent behalf from receiving a sum of Rs.26,73,765.19 or any amount from the Garnishee and further direct the Garnishee to deposit the sum of Rs.26,73,765.19 or any amount to the credit of the above application. 2. Heard Mr.D.Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant. 3. Service of notice on the respondents through Court is awaited. However, Affidavit of Service filed by the applicant, enclosing the acknowledgment card, indicates that notice had been duly served on the respondents. The names of the respondents have also been printed in the cause list today and when the matter was taken up, there is no representation on the side of the respondents neither through counsel nor did they appear before this Court. They are called absent and set ex-parte. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 898 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Having satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit and also the materials placed on record, there shall be an order, prohibiting the second respondent from making any payment to the tune of Rs.26,73,765.19 or any other lesser amount that is payable to the first respondent, pending the arbitration between the first respondent and the applicant and also direct the second respondent to deposit the same to the credit of this instant Arbitration Application No.898 of 2026 within a period of four weeks. 5. In fine, this application stands disposed of. No costs. 08.07.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No mp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 898 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. mp Arb Appln No. 898 of 2026 08.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis