Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4836 (CAL)

PRIYAJIT GHOSH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/17594/2024 · 2026-01-05

Suvra Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

January 5, 2026 (36) ARDR WPA 17594 of 2024 Priyajit Ghosh Vs. The State of West Bengal & ors. Adv. Sayantan Hazra, Adv. E. Kayes, … for the petitioner. Adv. Jayanta Samanta, Adv. Kaustav Chatterjee, …for the State. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record. None appears for the private respondent despite service. The petitioner alleges that the private respondent has put a padlock to the door of the building owned by him for which he is unable to enter the said building. The petitioner seeks police assistance for removal of the said padlock. In view of the fact that the petitioner is allegedly resisted from entering his residence by the private respondent, he is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance. In the meantime the police authority shall keep strict vigil in the area in order to avoid any untoward incident and to ensure maintenance of peace and tranquility. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the petition are deemed not to have been admitted. 2 Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)