Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48324 (CAL)

AINAL SHAIKH v. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS

WPA/22349/2026 · 2026-10-08

Uday Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

132 08.10.2026 Ct. No. 42 Moumita WPA 22349 of 2026 Ainal Shaikh Vs. The Election Commission of India and Ors. Mr. Razzak Hossain Mr. Karnab Biswas … for the petitioner Mr. Saumen Gayen ….for the State Ms. Anamika Pandey … for E.C.I. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner having EPIC No. UJM1559012 has preferred an appeal against deletion of his name in the SIR process before the designated Appellate Tribunal. 2. The petitioner prays for expeditious disposal of the said appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the Election Commission of India submits that huge number of appeals pending before the learned Appellate Tribunal, are being disposed of on a day-to-day basis. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. 6. WPA 22349 of 2026 is disposed of. 7. There shall be no order as to costs. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (UDAY KUMAR, J.)