Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48308 (KAR)

SMT JAYAMMA v. SRI V PUNEETH

MFA/5210/2020 · 2026-02-05

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6865 MFA No. 5210 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5210 OF 2020 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O BETTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 2. SRI. BETTEGOWDA S/O MAHIMA DASAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 3. SRI. K.B.PADMANABHA S/O BETTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENT OF 'SRIRANGA NIVASA', NO.422, 2ND MAIN, VINAYAKANAGARA, NAGASANDRA, BENGALURU-560073 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. HARSHA D JOSHI, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: SRI. V. PUNEETH S/O SRI. D. VEERABHADRAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT NO.282, (OLD NO.140/2) ALLAMAPRABHU ROAD, GAVIPURAM, BENGALURU-560019. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NAGAIAH, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6865 MFA No. 5210 of 2020 THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. 2. The appeal was listed on 04.02.2026 and there was no representation on behalf of appellants. For appearance of counsel for appellant, it was ordered to be listed on 05.02.2026 and it was also made clear that if none appears on behalf of appellants on the next date of hearing, the appeal would be dismissed for non-prosecution. As already noted above, there is no representation on behalf of appellants. It appears, the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37