Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48304 (CAL)

RANJILA MURMU AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/2059/2026 · 2026-10-08

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.10.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 14. Kausik (Partly Allowed) CRM (NDPS) 2059 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Raiganj Police Station Case No. 20/2025 dated 07.01.2025 under Sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of : Ranjila Murmu & Anr. ……Petitioners. Ms. Minoti Gomes Mr. Jisan Iqubal Hossain ……for the Petitioners. Ms. Shalini Bairagi ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are in custody for 1 year 9 months. 3 witnesses have been examined and one of the independent seizure list witnesses could not throw any light so far as the seizure is concerned. State opposes the prayer for bail as 740 Gms. of Brown Sugar has been recovered in the present case from the joint possession of the present petitioners. Having taken into account the period of incarceration and the petitioner no. 1 being a lady, I am granting bail to the petitioner no. 1, namely, Ranjila Murmu. 2 So far as petitioner no. 2, namely Md. Rejauddin is concerned, his prayer for bail is rejected. As such, petitioner no. 1, namely Ranjila Murmu be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Judge, under NDPS Act, Raiganj, Uttar Dinajpur. If on bail, the petitioner no. 1 shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Uttar Dinajpur without the prior permission of the learned Special Court. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 2059 of 2026 is partly allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)