Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
Date of reserved for orders : --------------- Date of pronouncement : 02.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010195772026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9840/2026 Between:
1. R D SRIDHAR, S/O LATE R.D.SRIRAMULU, AGED 56 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, NEAR D.NO.15-274 IN SY.NO.67/16, 67/17, 67/19, 67/20, PANAGAL, A.M.PUTTUR, SRIKALAHASTI TOWN, ' TIRUPATI DISTRICT, PIN CODE.517 644.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PIN.522 238.
2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNCIPAL ADSTRATIONCDMA, REP.BY ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY, VADDESWARAM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PIN.522502.
3. THE SRIKALAHASTI MUNICIPALITY, REP.BY ITS COMMISSIONER,.
SRIKALAHASTI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT., PIN CODE.517 644.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents,
2
particularly the impugned provisional notice in U.C.NO.01/2026/TPBO-3 dated 07.04.2026 issued by the 3rd respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of principles of natural justice and Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently to direct the respondents not to demolish the petitioner's residential house/godown situated near D.No.15-274 in Sy.No.67/16, 67/17, 67/19, 67/20, Panagal,A.M.Puttur, Srikalahasti town, Tirupati District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.3 not to demolish the petitioner's .residential house/godown near D.No.15-274 in Sy.No.67/16, 67/17, 67/19, 67/20, Panagal-A.M.Puttur, Srikalahasti town, Tirupati District pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K MOHAN RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. Gudapati Lakshminarayana SC For Municipalities in Rayalaseema Region
2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9840 of 2026
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition was filed challenging the notice in U.C.No.01/2026/TPBO-3 dated 07.04.2026 issued by the 3rd respondent. It is submitted that, during the pendency of the present writ petition, the 3rd respondent issued a Confirmation Notice dated 25.04.2026, which was challenged by the petitioner in W.P.No.12557 of 2026. It is further submitted that W.P.No.12557 of 2026 has already been disposed of by this Court.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G.Lakshmi Narayana, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent No.3.
3. Recording the aforesaid submission, in view of the disposal of W.P.No.12557 of 2026, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:02.7.2026 RSD
Whether the order is: Speaking
Reasoned ☑ Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
4
147 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 9840 of 2026 Date: 02.07.2026
RSD