Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48294 (MAD)

Sivalingam v. The District collector

WP/26450/2026 · 2026-07-08

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 26450 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 26450 of 2026 Sivalingam ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 2. The District Revenue officer, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri. 3. The Tahsildar, Dharmapuri Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 4. The Village Administrative officer, Konangi Nayakkanahalli Village, Dharmapuri Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 5. Madhan 6. Bhoopal 7. Krishnan 8. Govindaraj ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct enquiry in respect of the property situated at Survey No.515, Konangi Nayakkanahalli Village, Dharmapuri District, measuring to an extent of 5 acres and 50 cents https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26450 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 based on the petitioner’s representation dated 05.06.2026 and to rectify the revenue records. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Thirumalaivasan For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel for R1 to R4. ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.06.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 05.06.2026 to conduct enquiry in respect of the property situated at Survey No.515, Konangi Nayakkanahalli Village, Dharmapuri District, measuring to an extent of 5 acres and 50 cents based on the petitioner’s representation dated 05.06.2026 and to rectify the revenue records. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 4 and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 05.06.2026 will be considered within a period of eight weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26450 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 05.06.2026, after issuing due notice to the petitioner as well as respondents 5 to 8 and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 08-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: 1. The District collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 2. The District Revenue officer, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri. 3. The Tahsildar, Dharmapuri Taluk, Dharmapuri District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26450 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM 4. The Village Administrative officer, Konangi Nayakkanahalli Village, Dharmapuri Taluk, Dharmapuri District. WP No. 26450 of 2026 08-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis