PANCHANAN GIRI AND ORS. v. MANAS KUAMR DAS, ASSISTANT ENGINEER PWD HALDIA AND ANR.
CPAN/101/2026 · 2026-02-04
Jay Sengupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4828 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4828 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
04.02.2026 Sl. No. 290 Ct No. 28
SG
CPAN 101 of 2026
In WPA 389 of 2024
Panchanan Giri & Ors. Vs. Manas Kumar Das, Assistant Engineer, PWD Haldia & Anr.
Mr. Golam Mostafa,
Mr. T. Samanta. …for the applicant
1.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits as follows. By a judgment dated 14.01.2025 in WPA 389 of 2024 the writ petitioner was
disposed of by granting liberty to the petition to make an appropriate representation before the concerned SDO within a fortnight. In the event the same was made within two weeks from that date, the concerned SDO was to decide the matter in accordance with law and upon hearing all the interested parties expeditiously, preferably within eight weeks from making such application. Although the representation was considered by the concerned SDO and forwarded to the Assistant Engineer, PWD, no further steps were taken.
2. It appears that the order passed by this Court on 14.01.2025 has already been complied with by the concerned SDO.
2
3. If the petitioner is aggrieved with a subsequent inaction, it is open to him to raise the issue before the appropriate forum.
4. However, no further order need be passed in this matter.
5. Accordingly, the application for contempt is
disposed of without any further order, even as to costs.
6. Let urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)