- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1659 WP No. 17157 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.17157 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: B.S. BASAVARAJU S/O SHIVAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, R/O BYRANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, HONNAVALLI HOBLI, TIPTUR TALUK-572201, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S V PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. B.V. RAKSHITH S/O LATE B.N. VIJAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS. 2. SMT. AMBIKA W/O LATE B.N. VIJAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HOME MAKER. 3. B.S PARAMESHWARAIAH S/O LATE SHIVAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS 4. NANJAPPA S/O LATE SHIVAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS. 5. SMT. RAMAKKA W/O NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS HOME MAKER. 6. B.N. VISHWANATHA S/O NANJAPPA Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1659 WP No. 17157 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R-1 TO R-6 ARE R/O BYRANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE HONNAVALLI HOBLI TIPTUR TALUK – 572 201 TUMAKURU DISTRICT. B.N. SHIVAKUMAR SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HIS LR'S 7. B.R. RANJITHA W/O LATE B.N. SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, HOME MAKER. 8. NANDITHA B.S D/O LATE B.N. SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS, SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER B.R. RANJITHA, R-7. THE RESPONDENT NOS.7 AND 8 ARE RESIDING AT DODDANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ARASIKERE TALUK-573123, HASSAN DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GANGADHARAPPA A.V., ADVOCATE FOR R-1; R-4 TO R-8 ARE SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD. 25.04.2024 PASSED BY THE COURT OF LEARNED ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT TIPTUR IN O.S.NO.138/2015 RECALLING ITS EARLIER ORDER DTD. 22.04.2024 PRODUCED AS PER ANNX-J TO THE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1659 WP No. 17157 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 08.12.2025 seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The same reads as under: “The counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the lis between the petitioner and respondents has been settled amicably which has rendered the above writ petition infructuous. In the circumstances, the petitioner prays that the writ petition may be dismissed as having been withdrawn by allowing this memo in the ends of justice.” 2. Accordingly, petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE SV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51