MR N CHALAPATHI v. MR CHANDRA SEKHAR SRINIVAS VASIREDDY
WP/15115/2025 · 2026-01-20
S R Krishna Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48265 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48265 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2840 WP No. 15115 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 15115 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
MR N CHALAPATHI S/O SRI RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT 2ND FLOOR ABOVE, AECS DENTAL NO.1343, YDY BLOCK, 60 FEET ROAD, AECS LAYOUT, KUNDANAHALLI, BENGALURU URBAN-560 037 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJESH GOWDA., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
MR CHANDRA SEKHAR SRINIVAS VASIREDDY S/O LATE SRI. MALLIKARJUNA RAO VASIREDDY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT #1022, 20TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, HSR LAYOUT SECTOR-7, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU-560 102
2.
MRS. LATHA K D/O SRI. VENKATARAMANAAPPA KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.358/2, WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD, NEAR SHELL PETROL PUMP, SIDDAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU-560 066 Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2840 WP No. 15115 of 2025
3.
MRS. PRIYANKA BIRADAR D/O REVANA SIDDAPPA HOSAGOUDA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT # 51, GNYANA SHRADDHA RENAISSANCE HVV VALLEY, JARAK BANDE KAVAL FOREST ROAD JALAHALLI WEST, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU-560 105 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.C.BIRADAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO(A) TO ISSUE A WRIT OR NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTION THEREBY QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 16.05.2025, PASSED BY THE VACATION COURT, BENGALURU RURAL, (IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT BENGALURU), IN VOS NO. 98/2025, PASSED ON IA-2, UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC, BY ISSUING EMERGENT NOTICE, VIDE ANNEXURE-A, AND CONSEQUENTLY TO SET-ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 16.05.2025, PASSED BY THE VACATION COURT, BENGALURU RURAL, (IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT BENGALURU) IN VOS NO. 98/2025, PASSED ON IA-2, UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC, VIDE ANNEXURE-A, BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2840 WP No. 15115 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs: a) To issue a writ or nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction thereby quashing the
order dated 16.05.2025, passed by the Vacation Court, Bengaluru Rural, {in the court of Principal Senior Civil Judge Bengaluru Rural District at Bengaluru), in VOS No. 98/2025, passed on IA-2, under order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC, by issuing Emergent Notice, vide Annexure-A, and consequently to set-aside the order dated 16.05.2025, passed by the Vacation Court, Bengaluru Rural, (in the court of Principal Senior Civil Judge Bengaluru Rural District at Bengaluru) in VOS No.98/2025, passed on IA-2, under order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC, vide Annexure-A, by allowing the above petition. b) Restraining the Respondents/Defendants No. 13 to 15, their agent/s, legal heirs, workers, henchmen or GPA Holder or anybody claiming under them from alienating, encumbering, mortgaging or creating third party interest over the schedule property and from changing its nature, pending disposal of suit, until disposal of the IA-2, in VOS No. 98/2025, on the file of Vacation court, Bengaluru Rural, {in the court of Principal Senior Civil Judge Bengaluru Rural District at Bengaluru) vide Annexure- A. c) To pass such other suitable order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2840 WP No. 15115 of 2025
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents shall not alienate, encumber, dispose of or create third party right over the suit schedule property till disposal of the suit by the Trial Court, in accordance with law.
3. Submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents in placed on record.
4. The Undertaking given on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 3 that they will not alienate, encumber, dispose of or create third party right over the suit schedule property shall remain in force and operate between the parties till disposal of the suit by the Trial Court, in accordance with law.
All rival contentions on all aspects of the matter are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the merits/ de-merits of the rival contentions. Sd/-
(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR)
JUDGE DH, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17