Date of reserved for orders : ----------- Date of pronouncement : 08-07-2026 Date of uploading : APHC010260972019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 372/2020 Between: 1. KOYI ANJAMMA, W/O. LATE VEERA NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, HINDU, OCC- CULTIVATION, RIO. KOTAPADU VILLAGE, J. PANGULUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. GADDAM ANJANEYULU DIED, A 2. GADDAM SREENIVASA RAO, S/O. ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HINDU, OCC- CULTIVATION, RIO. KOTAPADU VILLAGE, J. PANGULUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. GADDAM SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O. LATE ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, HINDU, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. KOTAPADU VILLAGE, J. PANGULUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. KOYI VEERANARAYANA PLAINTIFF DIED, A 5. VALETI KOTESWARA RAO, (EXPARTE (D-2)) S/O. CHINA RAGHAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, HINDU, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. KOTAPADU VILLAGE, J. PANGULUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. KOYI HARIKRISHNA DIED, A 2 7. KOYI THIRUPATHAMMA, D/O. LATE VEERANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. KOTAPADU VILLAGE, J. PANGULUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. CHILUKURI JASU BABU, S/O. SINGAIAH, AGED ABCUT 35 YEARS, HINDU, OCC- CULT VATION, RIO. NAKK.ALAPALEM VILLAGE, INKOLLU MANDAL, PRAKASANI DISTRICT. 9. DOPPALAPUDI RAMANJAMMA, W/O. SESHU BABU, AGED ABC UT 40 YEARS, HINDU, OCC- HOUSEWIFE, R/O. DEVARAPALLI VILLAGE, PARCHURU MANDAL, PRAKASARI DISTRICT. (NO RELIEF IS BEING CLAIMED AGAINST RESPONDENTS 5, 7, 8 AND 9) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toMemorandum of Civil Revision Petition against the proceedings in E.P.No.49/2011 in 0.S.No.12611984, on the file of the Prl. Jr. Civil Judge Court, Addanki IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to condone the delay of 91 days in representing CRPSR No. 19193 of 2019 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct respondents 2 and 3 not to transfer or deliver or create any interest therein in favour of 3rd Parties in the property received by them under the delivery warrant in E.P.No.49 of 2011 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARRI VENKATA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. SWAPNA PRIYA CHAKKILAM 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter was settled outside the court and nothing survives in this revision. 2. Recording the said submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 08.07.2026 NNN Whether the order is : Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑