Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4825 (ORI)

DWITIKRUSHNA NAHAK @ TARU KALIA v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/1052/2026 · 2026-03-17

Gourishankar Satapathy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.1052 of 2026 Dwitikrushna Nahak @ Taru Kalia … Petitioner Mr. J.K. Khuntia, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. R.B. Mishra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL):17.03.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Aska PS Case No.411 of 2025 corresponding to GR Case No.1276 of 2025 pending in the file of learned JMFC (Cog.), Aska, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.126(2)/115(2)/118(2)/117(2)/109(1)/296/351(2) of BNS, on the main allegation of stabbing the injured Himanshu Das @ Himanshu Sekhar by means of a knife. 3. Heard, Mr. Jajati Keshari Khuntia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.B. Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. 4. After having considered the rival submissions taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the allegation sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the materials placed on record together with the allegation against the petitioner for stabbing p. 2 the injured with a knife for six to seven times on the left side of abdomen and the injured having sustained three lacerated wounds, out of which one being over left side abdomen in mid axillary line 4cm below nipple level and the petitioner having implicated in seven criminal cases, out of which in one case for commission of offences U/Ss.395/397 of IPC and another for offence U/S.302 of IPC and keeping in view the other circumstances on record in entirety, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands rejected. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the learned Court in seisin over the matter. (G. Satapathy) Judge Subhasmita Designation: Sr. Stenographer