Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4825 (BOM)

RAVIRAJ PALMS CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT AND ORS

WP/10793/2026 · 2026-08-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Gitalaxmi 10-WP-10793-2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10793 OF 2026 RAVIRAJ PALMS CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR. MOHAMMAD AFTAB JAWAID ...PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS Mr. Pavan S. Patil a/w Mr. Shubham S. Saraf & Mr. Tanmay A. Deshmukh, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. Nasir Ali Sayed, Secretary of the Society and Mr. Mohammad Aftab Jawaid, Managing Committee, Member duly authorized, the representatives of Raviraj Palms Housing Society Ltd., are present in the Court. Mr. Rohit Sakhadeo, Advocate for Respondent No. 4-Mira- Bhayander Corporation. Ms. Aloka A. Nadkarni, AGP for the State-Respondent. CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 28th AUGUST, 2026. 28th AUGUST, 2026 Gitalaxmi 10-WP-10793-2026.docx Per Court : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Learned AGP, so also learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation point out that against the impugned order, an Appeal is provided before the Sub-Divisional Officer. 3. In view of the submission made, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present Petition and to file an Appeal before the competent authority. If such an Appeal is filed, the concerned authority to decide the same in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner also submits that there is an urgency in the matter and that he may have to take up the matter for interim relief. If an application is so filed, the concerned authority to take up the matter and consider the application in accordance with law. 5. Learned AGP, in fairness, has submitted that they would not act in pursuance of the impugned order for a period of one week. Statement accepted. 6. Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 7. All contentions of the parties are left open. [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ] 28th AUGUST, 2026 GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Digitally signed by GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2026.08.28 19:06:09 +0530