SITA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
WPC/1749/2026 · 2026-03-23
Sri Ananda Sen
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4822 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4822 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:8084
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1749 of 2026 ------ Sita Devi, aged about 38 years, wife of Shri Bikku Kumar, resident of Pirtand, P.O. & P.S.- Pirtand, District- Giridih.
… … Petitioner(s) Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand; through Its Chief Secretary, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi.
2. Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi.
3. Engineer-in-chief, Water Resources Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi;
4. Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Zone, Dumka, P.O. & P.S.- Dumka, District- Dumka.
5. Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Giridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, District- Giridih.
… … Respondent(s) ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------
For the Petitioner(s) :Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advoate.
For the Resp-State :Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, A.G.
------ 02/ 23rd March, 2026
1. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner prays that the respondent no.2 be
directed to take appropriate action against respondent nos. 5 and others due to whose inaction, the amount of money which the petitioner is entitled to on completion of her contractual work in 2023 was not paid to her and further it is her case that in spite of completion of work, the respondents has certified that the petitioner has completed only 86% of the work for which the petitioner is suffering immensely.
3. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner categorically submits that he has filed this writ application with a prayer only to direct the respondent no.2 to take action against respondent no.5.
4. Considering the nature of prayer made by the petitioner, I am not inclined
2026:JHHC:8084
2
to entertain this writ application.
5. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any mala fide action of the government official, she may approach the Office of Lokayukt by filing a complaint.
6. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed with aforesaid observation.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 23.03.2026 Amar/CP-2 Uploaded on:-25.03.2026.