Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4822 (AP)

T. VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, KADAPA DISTRICT v. THE STATE OF A.P. HYDERABAD & 2 OTHERS

WP/12204/2008 · 2026-07-02

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : 13.07.2026 APHC010617062008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12204/2008 Between: 1. T. VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, KADAPA DISTRICT, S/O. LATE T.C. SUBBA REDDY, UNEMPLOYED, R/O. PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P HYDERABAD 2 OTHERS, REP BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT AGRICULTURE AND CO- OPERATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GAGAN VIHAR BUILDING, HYDERABAD. 3. THE KADAPA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, REP BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, KADAPA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a direction order or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus a) call for all the relevant records relating to connected with the proceedings in Rc.No. Bkg/Estt.AM-IV/Compassionate Appointments/2007-08, dated 11-2-2008 of the 3rd respondent Bank and 2 JS,J W.P.No.12204/2008 quash or set aside the same holding it to be arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India b) consequently direct the respondents to finalise and appoint the petitioner to the post of Staff Assistant on compassionate grounds and c) also direct the respondents to release that he would be entitled by virtue of declaration and direction as prayed for above and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 15726 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pass appropriate orders expeditiously on the request of the petitioner for being appointed on compassionate grounds in accordance with the guidelines issued by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No. 43051/2003/CR/DCCBs/II.B. dated 23-10-2004 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI 2. GP FOR COOPERATION 3 JS,J W.P.No.12204/2008 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo dated 23.06.2026 before the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 03.07.2026 RSD Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑ 4 JS,J W.P.No.12204/2008 126 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12204/2008 Dated: 03.07.2026 RSD