CRL OP No. 17681 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 17681 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No. 11869 of 2026 1. Vinitha W/o. Premanandan, Narothuparambi House, Viruppakka, Vazhani, Karumathra, Thrissur, Kerala – 680 589. 2. N.R.Premanadan S/o. Raman, Narothuparambi House, Viruppakka,Vazhani, Karumathra, Thrissur, Kerala – 680 589. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, M3, Puzhal Police Station, Chennai. Cr.No199/2025. 2. V.S.Adam S/Shahul Hameed, No.9, Thirumal Nagar, 18th Street, Puthagaram, Chennai -600 009. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the records in Cr.No.199 of 2025 on the file of the 1st Respondent herein and quash the same as illegal and without jurisdiction. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17681 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Mohammed Arif Khan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran Government Counsel (Crl. Side) for R1 Mr.Jijic Baby for R2 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash Crime No.199 of 2025 on the file of the 1st respondent Police for alleged offences under Sections 316(2), 318(2) & 61(2) of BNSS, on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.p.c. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The gist of facts leading to the instant case is that the de facto complainant was induced by the accused that he will marry the complainant and has been periodically borrowing amount from the complainant under one guise of the other, totalling to Rs.25,25,000/- and thereafter, the de facto complainant https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17681 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 found that the accused is living with his wife in his native place in Kerala. It is now submitted that the amounts are paid back and the issues have been ironed out between the parties. 4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. 5. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P. No. 17681 of 2026 stands allowed. The Crime No.199 of 2025 on the file of the 1st respondent Police stands quashed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 09-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No KKN To 1. The Inspector of Police, M3, Puzhal Police Station, Chennai. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17681 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. KKN CRL OP No. 17681 of 2026 09-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis