- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:844 RSA No. 957 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 957 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT. DEVEERAMMA W/O LATE KALLEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/O SEETHAPURA VILLAGE CHINAKURALI HOBLI PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT 571438 …APPELLANT (BY SRI K.L. SREENIVAS, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI. S NAGARAJU S/O LATE SHIVEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O SEETHAPURA VILLAE CHINAKURALI HOBLI PANDAVPAURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT 571438. 2. SRI VENKATESH S/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 3. SMT SOUBHAGYA W/O S T VENKATESHA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 4. SRI S B DARSHAN S/O S T VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:844 RSA No. 957 of 2024 ALL ARE R/AT SEETHAPURA VILLAGE CHINAKURALI HOBLI PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT 571438 …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, PADAVAPURA, ON 10.02.2022 IN R.A.NO.28/2021 AND ETC., THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for IV time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 75