[2026:RJ-JP:12895] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3809/2026 Sonu S/o Ramroop, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Dalpura, P.s. Nadauti, District Karoli, Rajasthan (Confined In Tonk Jail) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kankoriya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA Mr. Paras Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 27/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.468/2025 registered at Police Station Newai, District Tonk for offences under Sections 137(2) and 308(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in the present matter, a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and in support thereof he has placed on record a copy of the compromise entered into with the complainant along with the affidavit of Arjun. Petitioner is behind the bars since 07.02.2026 with criminal antecedent of one case of the similar nature in which he is already bailed out. The trial of the case will [2026:RJ-JP:12895] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3809/2026] take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant admits the compromise arrived at between the parties and states that he has no objection if the bail application of the petitioner is allowed. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sonu S/o Ramroop, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/67