HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8515 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Learned counsel for the applicant; and Learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 184 of 2026, under Sections 191(1), 191(2), 109(1), 115(2), 351(3), 352 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932, Police Station - Nagal, District Saharanpur, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail, as the applicant apprehends his arrest in the aforesaid case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegation is that two parties were indulging in violence and assaulting each other using lathis, sticks, and iron rods, and also throwing brickbats on each other from the roofs of their houses. The FIR was registered against 23 named accused and some unknown persons by the police. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant. The injured who are six in number have not received any injury which may be considered to be dangerous to life. Applicant has no criminal antecedents. He submits that similarly situated co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8171 of 2026. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but does not dispute the lack of criminal antecedents of the applicant. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. 6. The FIR has been lodged by a Sub-Inspector of Police against two parties allegedly assaulting each other and throwing brickbats from the roofs of their houses. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant. None of the injuries have been opined to be dangerous to life. Taking into account the number of injured, the number of accused nominated in the FIR, false implication cannot be ruled out. Similarly situated co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in CRIMINAL Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Aslam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sameer .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8171 of 2026. 7. Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, as discussed above, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail. 8. The anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. 9. In the event of the arrest of the applicant- Sameer, involved in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii. The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. September 8, 2026 Sachin NABAIL No. 8515 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad