Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48199 (KAR)

SRI MAHESH N v. AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD.

WP/16059/2024 · 2026-01-06

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:399 WP No. 16059 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 16059 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SRI MAHESH N SON OF NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO. 135/75, GROUND FLOOR, 3rd MAIN ROAD, LAKSHMINARAYANA LAYOUT, MUNNEKOLALA BENGALURU 560 037 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LOKESHA Y., ADVOCATE) AND: AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD., NO.3, JVT TOWER, 1ST AND 2ND FLOORS, 8TH A MAIN ROAD, S R NAGAR BENGALURU 560027 REP. BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY / MANAGER …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ARAVINDA BABU B S., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TODIRECT THE RESPONDENTS DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:399 WP No. 16059 of 2024 CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD 03.06.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-C TO PROVIDE TIME PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS TO CLEAR THE ENTIRE LOAN AMOUNT IN RESPECT OF LOAN ACCOUNT NO. 2280000017 TO THE RESPONDENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 03.06.2024 vide Annexure-C, seeking time to clear the entire loan amount. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent filed a memo stating that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has cleared his outstanding dues under ‘One time settlement scheme’ and as such, the petitioner's loan account with the respondent has been closed. 3. Memo is placed on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:399 WP No. 16059 of 2024 4. In view of this development the writ petition has become infructuous and does not survive for consideration. 5. As the petitioner has already cleared the outstanding dues, in view of the same, the writ petition does not survive for consideration. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE sks CT:KHV