M/S SSA ENTERPRISES v. KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
WP/16375/2021 · 2026-02-02
E S Indiresh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48171 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48171 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5628 WP NO.16375 OF 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.16375 OF 2021 (GM-KSFC) BETWEEN:
M/S SSA ENTERPRISES A REGISTERED FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT:
NO.831, 6TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, T.K. LAYOUT, MYSURU - 570 009.
REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MRS. KOKILA K.N., W/O H.S. MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION ESTABLISHED UNDER THE STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATIONS ACT, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT:
KSFC BHAVAN, 1/1, THIMMAIAH ROAD, VASANTHNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 052.
REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER.
2.
THE ASST. GENERAL MANAGER - II KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION ESTABLISHED UNDER THE STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION ACT, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT:
KSFC BHAVAN, 1/1, THIMMAIAH ROAD VASANTHANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 052. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5628 WP NO.16375 OF 2021
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 24TH AUGUST, 2021 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1-GENERAL MANAGER (CIRCLE-2) VIDE ANENXURE-E1; QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 30TH AUGUST, 2021 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2-ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER VIDE ANNEXURE-F; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER
In this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 24th August, 2021 passed by the respondent No.1 and Notice dated 30th August, 2021 (Annexure-F) issued by the respondent No.2; inter alia sought for direction to the respondents to restore the possession of the seized factory premises to the petitioner.
2. Heard Sri. Manjunath S., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Bipin Hegde, learned counsel appearing for respondents.
3. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is challenging the Notice dated 30th August, 2021 (Annexure-F),
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5628 WP NO.16375 OF 2021
I am of the view, the petitioner has to approach the respondent-Corporation for redressal of its grievance. With this observation, writ petition stands disposed of.
SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE
ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16