BAJRANG SINGH SON OF SARDAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SOSA/537/2026 · 2026-03-24
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4816 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4816 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.537/2026 in S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 606/2026 Bajrang Singh S/o Sardar Singh, R/O Badkheda, Police Station Kalan, District Jhalawar At Present Jodhana Hotel Shokliya, Police Station Sarwad, District Ajmer (Raj.) ----Appellant Versus The State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sharma with Mr.Gaurav Sharma, Mr.Sarthak Choubey & Ms.Kamini Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr.Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 24/03/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant have been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 332 & 353 of IPC vide the impugned order dated 07.03.2026 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases) Ajmer, in Sessions Case No.35/2014. Counsel submits that the maximum sentence awarded to the appellant is two years simple imprisonment and the same has already been suspended by the Trial Court and disposal of the instant appeal is bound to take time, therefore, the sentence awarded to the appellant by the Trial Court be suspended till disposal of the instant appeal. (2 of 3) [SOSA-537/2026]
2. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the suspension of sentence application. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by counsel for the appellant and looking to the fact that the maximum sentence awarded to the appellant is two years simple imprisonment and the same has already been suspended by the Trial Court and looking to the fact that disposal of the appeal is likely to take time, this Court is of the opinion that the instant case is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused-appellant. 5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed by the appellant under Section 430 BNSS, 2023 is allowed and the sentence awarded by the Court of Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases) Ajmer in Sessions Case No.35/2014 vide judgment dated 07.03.2026 against the appellant-Bajrang Singh S/o Sardar Singh shall remain suspended till final disposal of the instant appeal and subject to the condition that the appellant shall deposit the fine amount as imposed by the Trial Court and he shall be released on bail provided he executes a personal bond for the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Judge for his appearance in this Court on 24.04.2026 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-
1. That he shall appear before the Trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided. (3 of 3) [SOSA-537/2026]
2.
That if the appellant changes his place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the Trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court. 3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s) and/or mobile number(s), they will give in writing their changed address and/or mobile number(s) to the Trial Court. 4. Appellant shall deposit the fine amount as imposed by the learned Trial Court. 5. In case, the appellant is found involved in committing and repeating the same offence again, the State/complainant would be at liberty to move application for cancellation of bail. 6. The learned Trial Court shall maintain the record of attendance of the accused-appellants in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case relating to the original case in which the accused-appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. The criminal misc. case file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the Trial court. 7. In case the accused-appellant does not appear before the Trial Court and/or commits any default, the learned Trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /20